Deprecated: Creation of dynamic property SimpleLoginLog::$installed_ver is deprecated in /home/site/wwwroot/wp-content/plugins/simple-login-log/simple-login-log.php on line 46
{"id":282089,"date":"2023-01-20T17:30:57","date_gmt":"2023-01-20T12:00:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=282089"},"modified":"2023-01-20T17:09:55","modified_gmt":"2023-01-20T11:39:55","slug":"supreme-court-collegium-dimissory-stated-department-of-justice-cannot-repeatedly-send-back-same-proposal-reiterated-after-duly-considering-objections-of-government-legal-news-legal-reseach-updates","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blog.scconline.gen.in\/post\/2023\/01\/20\/supreme-court-collegium-dimissory-stated-department-of-justice-cannot-repeatedly-send-back-same-proposal-reiterated-after-duly-considering-objections-of-government-legal-news-legal-reseach-updates\/","title":{"rendered":"Department of Justice cannot repeatedly return judgeship proposals; Supreme Court Collegium reiterates recommendation of two Calcutta High Court Advocates"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
Tweet<\/a><\/div>\n
\n

Supreme Court<\/span>: Supreme Court Collegium comprising of Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, S.K. Kaul and K.M. Joseph J.J., while expressing its dimissory stated that the Department of Justice cannot repeatedly send back the same proposal which has been reiterated by the Supreme Court Collegium after duly considering the objections of the Government.<\/p>\n

The Centre had sought reconsideration of elevation of Advocate Amitesh Banerjee and Advocate Sakya Sen for the second time. They were first recommended by the Collegium of the Calcutta High Court on 17-12-2018 which was approved by the Supreme Court Collegium on 24-07-2019. However, Department of Justice referred back their names on 23-07-2021 with additional Intelligence Bureau inputs in respect of Advocate Sakya Sen on 27-09-2021.<\/p>\n

Supreme Court Collegium reiterated its earlier recommendation in respect of Advocate Amitesh Banerjee and Advocate Sakya Sen on 01-09-2021 and 08-10-2021 respectively. The Department of Justice, however, once again referred back the file on 25-11-2022.<\/p>\n

Condemning the hither thither tactic, the Collegium stated that the Department of Justice did not mention any fresh ground for refusal for the second time.<\/p>\n

“Moreover, after the Supreme Court Collegium reiterated the proposal on 01 September 2021, it was not open to the Department to repeatedly send back the same proposal which has been reiterated by the Supreme Court Collegium after duly considering the objections of the Government.”<\/p>\n

The Collegium, thus, reiterated its recommendation for the second time and returned the file for processing the recommendations expeditiously for appointment of Advocate Amitesh Banerjee and Advocate Sakya Sen as Judges of the Calcutta High Court.<\/p>\n\n

*Simran Singh, Editorial Assistant has put this report together.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

“Moreover, after the Supreme Court Collegium reiterated the proposal on 01 September 2021, it was not open to the Department to repeatedly send back the same proposal which has been reiterated by the Supreme Court Collegium after duly considering the objections of the Government.” said the Collegium.<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":282092,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1188,2],"tags":[54598,54599,2513,37967],"class_list":["post-282089","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hot_off_the_press","category-news","tag-advocate-amitesh-banerjee","tag-advocate-sakya-sen","tag-Calcutta_High_Court","tag-supreme-court-collegium"],"yoast_head":"\nDepartment of Justice cannot repeatedly return judgeship proposals; Supreme Court Collegium reiterates recommendation of two Calcutta High Court Advocates | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Supreme Court Collegium comprising of Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, S.K. Kaul and K.M. Joseph J.J., while expressing its dimissory stated\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/blogscconline-staging.azurewebsites.net\/post\/2023\/01\/20\/supreme-court-collegium-dimissory-stated-department-of-justice-cannot-repeatedly-send-back-same-proposal-reiterated-after-duly-considering-objections-of-government-legal-news-legal-reseach-updates\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Department of Justice cannot repeatedly return judgeship proposals; Supreme Court Collegium reiterates recommendation of two Calcutta High Court Advocates | SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court Collegium comprising of Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, S.K. Kaul and K.M. Joseph J.J., while expressing its dimissory stated\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/blogscconline-staging.azurewebsites.net\/post\/2023\/01\/20\/supreme-court-collegium-dimissory-stated-department-of-justice-cannot-repeatedly-send-back-same-proposal-reiterated-after-duly-considering-objections-of-government-legal-news-legal-reseach-updates\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-01-20T12:00:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-01-20T11:39:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/blog.scconline.gen.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-146.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"389\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"326\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor_4\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor_4\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blogscconline-staging.azurewebsites.net\/post\/2023\/01\/20\/supreme-court-collegium-dimissory-stated-department-of-justice-cannot-repeatedly-send-back-same-proposal-reiterated-after-duly-considering-objections-of-government-legal-news-legal-reseach-updates\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/blogscconline-staging.azurewebsites.net\/post\/2023\/01\/20\/supreme-court-collegium-dimissory-stated-department-of-justice-cannot-repeatedly-send-back-same-proposal-reiterated-after-duly-considering-objections-of-government-legal-news-legal-reseach-updates\/\",\"name\":\"Department of Justice cannot repeatedly return judgeship proposals; Supreme Court Collegium reiterates recommendation of two Calcutta High Court Advocates | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blogscconline-staging.azurewebsites.net\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blogscconline-staging.azurewebsites.net\/post\/2023\/01\/20\/supreme-court-collegium-dimissory-stated-department-of-justice-cannot-repeatedly-send-back-same-proposal-reiterated-after-duly-considering-objections-of-government-legal-news-legal-reseach-updates\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blogscconline-staging.azurewebsites.net\/post\/2023\/01\/20\/supreme-court-collegium-dimissory-stated-department-of-justice-cannot-repeatedly-send-back-same-proposal-reiterated-after-duly-considering-objections-of-government-legal-news-legal-reseach-updates\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-146.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-01-20T12:00:57+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-01-20T11:39:55+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blogscconline-staging.azurewebsites.net\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Supreme Court Collegium comprising of Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, S.K. Kaul and K.M. Joseph J.J., while expressing its dimissory stated\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blogscconline-staging.azurewebsites.net\/post\/2023\/01\/20\/supreme-court-collegium-dimissory-stated-department-of-justice-cannot-repeatedly-send-back-same-proposal-reiterated-after-duly-considering-objections-of-government-legal-news-legal-reseach-updates\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/blogscconline-staging.azurewebsites.net\/post\/2023\/01\/20\/supreme-court-collegium-dimissory-stated-department-of-justice-cannot-repeatedly-send-back-same-proposal-reiterated-after-duly-considering-objections-of-government-legal-news-legal-reseach-updates\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blogscconline-staging.azurewebsites.net\/post\/2023\/01\/20\/supreme-court-collegium-dimissory-stated-department-of-justice-cannot-repeatedly-send-back-same-proposal-reiterated-after-duly-considering-objections-of-government-legal-news-legal-reseach-updates\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-146.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-146.jpg\",\"width\":389,\"height\":326},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blogscconline-staging.azurewebsites.net\/post\/2023\/01\/20\/supreme-court-collegium-dimissory-stated-department-of-justice-cannot-repeatedly-send-back-same-proposal-reiterated-after-duly-considering-objections-of-government-legal-news-legal-reseach-updates\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/blogscconline-staging.azurewebsites.net\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Department of Justice cannot repeatedly return judgeship proposals; Supreme Court Collegium reiterates recommendation of two Calcutta High Court Advocates\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blogscconline-staging.azurewebsites.net\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/blogscconline-staging.azurewebsites.net\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/blogscconline-staging.azurewebsites.net\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blogscconline-staging.azurewebsites.net\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor_4\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blogscconline-staging.azurewebsites.net\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c03417897e07cdee597fca638d014df1?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c03417897e07cdee597fca638d014df1?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor_4\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/blog.scconline.gen.in\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Department of Justice cannot repeatedly return judgeship proposals; Supreme Court Collegium reiterates recommendation of two Calcutta High Court Advocates | SCC Times","description":"Supreme Court Collegium comprising of Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, S.K. Kaul and K.M. Joseph J.J., while expressing its dimissory stated","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/blogscconline-staging.azurewebsites.net\/post\/2023\/01\/20\/supreme-court-collegium-dimissory-stated-department-of-justice-cannot-repeatedly-send-back-same-proposal-reiterated-after-duly-considering-objections-of-government-legal-news-legal-reseach-updates\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Department of Justice cannot repeatedly return judgeship proposals; Supreme Court Collegium reiterates recommendation of two Calcutta High Court Advocates | SCC Times","og_description":"Supreme Court Collegium comprising of Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, S.K. Kaul and K.M. Joseph J.J., while expressing its dimissory stated","og_url":"https:\/\/blogscconline-staging.azurewebsites.net\/post\/2023\/01\/20\/supreme-court-collegium-dimissory-stated-department-of-justice-cannot-repeatedly-send-back-same-proposal-reiterated-after-duly-considering-objections-of-government-legal-news-legal-reseach-updates\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-01-20T12:00:57+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-01-20T11:39:55+00:00","og_image":[{"width":389,"height":326,"url":"https:\/\/blog.scconline.gen.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-146.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor_4","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor_4","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/blogscconline-staging.azurewebsites.net\/post\/2023\/01\/20\/supreme-court-collegium-dimissory-stated-department-of-justice-cannot-repeatedly-send-back-same-proposal-reiterated-after-duly-considering-objections-of-government-legal-news-legal-reseach-updates\/","url":"https:\/\/blogscconline-staging.azurewebsites.net\/post\/2023\/01\/20\/supreme-court-collegium-dimissory-stated-department-of-justice-cannot-repeatedly-send-back-same-proposal-reiterated-after-duly-considering-objections-of-government-legal-news-legal-reseach-updates\/","name":"Department of Justice cannot repeatedly return judgeship proposals; Supreme Court Collegium reiterates recommendation of two Calcutta High Court Advocates | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogscconline-staging.azurewebsites.net\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogscconline-staging.azurewebsites.net\/post\/2023\/01\/20\/supreme-court-collegium-dimissory-stated-department-of-justice-cannot-repeatedly-send-back-same-proposal-reiterated-after-duly-considering-objections-of-government-legal-news-legal-reseach-updates\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogscconline-staging.azurewebsites.net\/post\/2023\/01\/20\/supreme-court-collegium-dimissory-stated-department-of-justice-cannot-repeatedly-send-back-same-proposal-reiterated-after-duly-considering-objections-of-government-legal-news-legal-reseach-updates\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-146.jpg","datePublished":"2023-01-20T12:00:57+00:00","dateModified":"2023-01-20T11:39:55+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogscconline-staging.azurewebsites.net\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Supreme Court Collegium comprising of Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, S.K. Kaul and K.M. Joseph J.J., while expressing its dimissory stated","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogscconline-staging.azurewebsites.net\/post\/2023\/01\/20\/supreme-court-collegium-dimissory-stated-department-of-justice-cannot-repeatedly-send-back-same-proposal-reiterated-after-duly-considering-objections-of-government-legal-news-legal-reseach-updates\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/blogscconline-staging.azurewebsites.net\/post\/2023\/01\/20\/supreme-court-collegium-dimissory-stated-department-of-justice-cannot-repeatedly-send-back-same-proposal-reiterated-after-duly-considering-objections-of-government-legal-news-legal-reseach-updates\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/blogscconline-staging.azurewebsites.net\/post\/2023\/01\/20\/supreme-court-collegium-dimissory-stated-department-of-justice-cannot-repeatedly-send-back-same-proposal-reiterated-after-duly-considering-objections-of-government-legal-news-legal-reseach-updates\/#primaryimage","url":"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-146.jpg","contentUrl":"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-146.jpg","width":389,"height":326},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/blogscconline-staging.azurewebsites.net\/post\/2023\/01\/20\/supreme-court-collegium-dimissory-stated-department-of-justice-cannot-repeatedly-send-back-same-proposal-reiterated-after-duly-considering-objections-of-government-legal-news-legal-reseach-updates\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/blogscconline-staging.azurewebsites.net\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Department of Justice cannot repeatedly return judgeship proposals; Supreme Court Collegium reiterates recommendation of two Calcutta High Court Advocates"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/blogscconline-staging.azurewebsites.net\/#website","url":"https:\/\/blogscconline-staging.azurewebsites.net\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/blogscconline-staging.azurewebsites.net\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/blogscconline-staging.azurewebsites.net\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor_4","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/blogscconline-staging.azurewebsites.net\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c03417897e07cdee597fca638d014df1?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c03417897e07cdee597fca638d014df1?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor_4"},"url":"https:\/\/blog.scconline.gen.in\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-146.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peKwBY-1bnP","jetpack-related-posts":[],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.scconline.gen.in\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/282089"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.scconline.gen.in\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.scconline.gen.in\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.scconline.gen.in\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.scconline.gen.in\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=282089"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/blog.scconline.gen.in\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/282089\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":282091,"href":"https:\/\/blog.scconline.gen.in\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/282089\/revisions\/282091"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.scconline.gen.in\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/282092"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.scconline.gen.in\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=282089"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.scconline.gen.in\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=282089"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.scconline.gen.in\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=282089"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}