National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), New Delhi: In a matter with regard to fees of resolution professional, the Coram of Justice Ashok Bhushan (Chairperson) and Shreesha Merla (Technical Member) held that, when proceedings in a matter are put to stay, the resolution professional is not entitled to fees during the stay on insolvency.
An appeal had been filed against the order of the National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai, by which the Resolution Professional was allowed for reimbursement of Rs 30,81,719.
In 2018, the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process was initiated, and the Insolvency Resolution Professional was appointed.
Appellant contended that, when the Supreme Court of India had stayed the insolvency proceedings, there was no entitled fee to be paid to the Resolution Professional.
Further, the Counsel for the Resolution Professional submitted that even when the Insolvency Proceedings were stayed, certain expenses were incurred by the RP which payment cannot be denied.
Analysis and Decision
Tribunal stated that, when the Supreme Court order 26-11-2018, had stayed the insolvency proceedings which proceedings ultimately were set aside by the final Judgment dated 2-9-2019, the Resolution Professional was not entitled to any fee after 26-11-2018.
In view of the above, the appeal was partly allowed. [IndusInd Bank Ltd. v. Rajendra K. Bhuta, 2022 SCC OnLine NCLAT 201, decided on 26-4-2022]
Advocates before the Tribunal:
For Appellant: Mr. Rohit Gupta, Ms. Rubina Khan, Advocates.
For Respondent: Mr. Rajeev K Pandey, Mr. Rajeev M Roy, Advocates for R-2
Mr. Mayank Kshirsagar, Darryl Pereira, Advocates for IRP/R1
