Allahabad High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“Only where one of the parties is seen to have voluntarily deserted the other and parties have continued in that status for a long period of time, then in view of other attending circumstances indicating there was no substance in the marriage, a conclusion may be reached that the marriage had been irretrievably broken down”

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court was of the view that the only test in such extraordinary situations must be as to whether the medical treatment is actually availed of. Once the answer is in affirmative, the reimbursement must be full while dealing with such cases pertaining to COVID pandemic.

Continue reading
Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court referred to Rajendra Roy v. Union of India, (1993) 1 SCC 148 wherein it was held that, it is possible to draw reasonable inference of mala fide action from the pleadings and antecedent facts and circumstances, however it cannot be drawn from insinuation and vague suggestions.

Continue reading
Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court referred to Niranjan Singh v. Prabhakar Rajaram Kharote (1980) 2 SCC 559, wherein it was explained that no lexical dexterity nor precedential profusion is needed to come to the realistic conclusion that he who is under the control of the court or is in the physical hold of an officer with coercive power is in custody for the purpose of Section 439, CrPC.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“These allegations, which are not only unsupported by evidence but also seem to be driven by malice, undermine the integrity of the judicial process. The claims are made without any regard for truth and appear to be designed to manipulate or mislead”

Continue reading
Sikkim High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The impugned judgment of the Sessions Court had observed that if a court finds that the testimony of a prosecutrix inspires the confidence of the court and is found reliable and trustworthy, then the court can rely on her sole testimony for convicting the accused and need not look for corroboration of her testimony elsewhere.

Continue reading