delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The unfilled cans which have been seized, shall be released in favour of the Defendants, which were given to them on a superdari basis, in the presence of a representative of the plaintiff. The plaintiff’s representative may accordingly visit the Defendants’ premises on 01-11-2023 at 11:00 a.m.

Continue reading
delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The comparison of the features of the prior existing third party apps with Plaintiffs’ mobile app, fortifies the stand of the Defendants that the distinguishing features are not enough for the Plaintiffs to cross the threshold of idea expression dichotomy to claim originality and consequently protection in the gaming app and copyright infringement.

Continue reading
rajasthan high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“It is true that discipline is the hallmark of disciplinary forces like police and each and every member of the disciplinary forces are not supposed to violate the discipline by consuming liquor in public space or should arrive in public place in a drunken position.”

Continue reading
madras high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Earlier in a writ petition concerning the issue of continuation of V. Senthil Balaji as a Cabinet Minister of the State consequent to his arrest, the Court left it to Chief Minister MK Stalin to decide about the continuance of Senthil Balaji (who is in judicial custody) as a Minister without Portfolio

Continue reading
delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“The object of Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 is to ensure that during the matrimonial proceedings either party should not be handicapped and suffer any financial disability to litigate only because of paucity of source of income.”

Continue reading
delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“Though the specific words used for the news programme may themselves not be capable of being monopolized, the combination marks can be protected if they have acquired a secondary significance.”

Continue reading
rajasthan high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“First progress report of the investigation has been called for in seven years. Moreover, the administrative instruction has not been followed inasmuch as more than thrice transfer of investigation of the case was not permissible.”

Continue reading