Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The assertion made in the bail application that the complainant, “being a married woman, was mature and intelligent enough to understand the significance and consequences of her actions” is a specious argument that cannot absolve the accused of the allegations levelled against him.

Continue reading
Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“The object of compassionate appointment is to relieve the hardship due to the death of a bread winner in the family and the appointment is provided to redeem the family in distress. At the same time, it is to be borne in mind that compassionate appointment cannot be construed as opening an alternative mode of recruitment to public employment.”

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The anomaly is that if a foreign national is released from judicial custody on bail while facing charges under Foreigners Act, how can the same foreign national be detained again at a detention centre/restriction centre by executive order for violation of the very same provisions.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“This Court while acknowledging that speedy trial is necessary as a Constitutional prescription, observes that in cases involving anti-national activities and terrorism on an international scale, long incarceration in itself ought not to lead to enlargement on bail, when facts showed involvement in such activities which can have a national and transnational impact.”

Continue reading
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“In matters of recruitment to services, interference to the process of recruitment when otherwise conducted in a transparent, fair and reasonable manner with no allegation of malafides cannot be gone into in the limited power of judicial review of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution.”

Continue reading
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“The investigating agency must instead rely on independent and lawful methods to gather information rather than pressuring the accused to act against their constitutional safeguards. Insisting on custodial interrogation solely for self-incriminatory purposes is unconstitutional and sets a dangerous precedent.”

Continue reading
Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

By Resolution dated 12-04-2017, Permanent Selection and Appointment Committee of the High Court had resolved that for determining quota prescribed under Rule 5 of Maharashtra Judicial Service Rules, 2008, actual working strength of Judges in that cadre as on 31st March of every year had to be taken into consideration.

Continue reading