Consumer protection Act
Case BriefsSupreme Court

“Any interpretation of the Preamble or the scheme of the Act for construing ‘Profession’ as ‘Business’ or ‘Trade’; or ‘Professional’ as ‘service provider’ would be extending the scope of the Act which was not intended, rather would have a counter productive effect”

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“The Court’s jurisdiction at the pre-reference stage is only to determine the prime facie existence of an arbitration agreement and the final adjudication, even on the question of limitation, is to be left to the arbitral tribunal, being the parties’ chosen forum.”

Continue reading
Allahabad High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“The Statehas miserably failed to show any patent illegality warranting interference in appellate jurisdiction. Mere allegation would not suffice until and unless it stands substantiated from the pleading and the records.”

Continue reading
Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court said that when confronted with a question pertaining the custody of a minor child, the Court as parens partriae, should not decide on the consideration of the legal rights of the parties, but on the sole and predominant criterion of the child’s best interest and welfare.

Continue reading
CESTAT
Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

The Tribunal opined that once the coal companies have charged sales tax/VAT at the appropriate rate on the sale of coal to appellant and in turn, appellant has charged sales tax/VAT to the consumers of coal, the transaction is one of sale/purchase and not of rendering service.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Plaintiff’s X mark is derived from their ‘SPARX’ logo and has been used in a standalone form in relation to its footwear products sold under the ‘SPARX’ brand. Plaintiff’s grievance is against the defendants who started using defendants’ X mark, which was deceptively similar, for footwear as well, being identical goods.

Continue reading
Patna High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Shariat law permits Muslim to contract more than one marriage, but it must be borne in mind that merely because an act was lawful, it did not per se become justifiable in married life. Contracting a second marriage by a Muslim may be lawful, but it causes enormous cruelty to the first wife.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“In criminal trials certificate in terms of Section 65-B of the Act is to filed before commencement of the trial. However, the Trial Court, in its discretion, after examining any application by the prosecution under Sections 91 or 311 CrPC or Section 165 of the Evidence, may permit production of such certificate at any stage of the trial if no irreversible prejudice is caused to the accused”

Continue reading
Jharkhand High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“An advocate has to fearlessly uphold the interest of his client by all fair and honourable means without regard to any unpleasant consequences to himself or any other, but he must exercise restraint in using intemperate language during arguments in the Court.”

Continue reading
Tripura High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

A High-Powered Committee was constituted by the High Court to look into transfer/rehabilitation of captive elephants. Later on, the Supreme extended the Committee’s jurisdiction throughout the country for welfare, care and rehabilitation of wild animals including captive elephants.

Continue reading