delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“The Tree Officer and the Officer concerned of MCD were directed to conduct an inspection at least once in four weeks to ensure that the site is being maintained in a manner conducive to the preservation of the banyan tree.”

Continue reading
Second Petition under Section 482 CrPC
Case BriefsSupreme Court

The Supreme Court was deciding the appeal against Allahabad High Court’s order wherein it had held that the petitioner could not continue to challenge the proceedings when he had not raised objections to the charge sheet or cognizance order in his first petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

Continue reading
delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“There is every likelihood of defendant’s cloud kitchen services being perceived as another extension of plaintiff’s services owing to the nature of the ‘SOCIAL’ series of marks used by plaintiff.”

Continue reading
delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Policies are often drafted keeping in view the larger public interest, balancing various competing interests. Unless a policy is manifestly arbitrary, discriminatory, or mala fide, the wisdom and advisability of governmental policies are outside the purview of judicial review.

Continue reading
madras high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The remedy for the petitioners is only as against the Private Company by filing necessary applications at Nigeria. However, these poor widows cannot pursue the litigations in Nigeria and therefore, there is a responsibility cast upon the Ministry of External Affairs and the Ministry of Overseas Indian Affairs to take appropriate action through the Embassy to redress the grievance of these petitioners.

Continue reading
national green tribunal
Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

“The use of firecrackers in cities/towns where air quality is ‘moderate’ or below was restricted to only green crackers only and for duration of not more than two hours and only for celebration of any specified festival or occasion”.

Continue reading
delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

It is for violation of Section 18(2) and Section 18(3) of the FERA that would entail action under Section 56 FERA, but the intervening threshold of issuance of show cause notice/opportunity notice and hearing the notice before passing the decision upon such mandatory application of principles of natural justice alone that the action under Section 56 could, at all, have been initiated.

Continue reading
delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“There is no doubt about the factum of marriage between the petitioners and the fact that they are major. No one, not even the family members can object to such relation or to the matrimonial ties between the petitioners.”

Continue reading
delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Section 112 of the Evidence Act underscores the principle that children born within the confines of a legally recognized marriage are deemed legitimate per se and it ensures that no unwarranted assumptions of impropriety or moral transgressions are made and instead places the burden of proof on those who contest the child’s legitimacy.

Continue reading