Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The action for suspension, removal, or dismissal of the trustee under Section 41-D of the Maharashtra Public Trust Act, 1950 (‘the MPT Act’) is an independent action having no connection with the enquiry to be conducted under Section 22 of the MPT Act.

Continue reading
Benefit of Probation of Offenders Act
Case BriefsSupreme Court

There was a feud between two groups of the family which resulted in an armed clash between the groups and culminated in the filing of separate complaints by the respective groups. The High Court set aside the conviction and sentence under Sections 307, 148, and 149 of the IPC but affirmed his conviction under Sections 326, 325, 452, and 323 of the IPC.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“The record shows that the petitioner (‘accused’) has committed heinous offences while he was on bail in other cases; and he has been convicted in the offences committed while on bail. When there is a long list of serious criminal involvements, the apprehension that the accused suffers from recidivism cannot be dismissed as imaginary.”

Continue reading
Orissa High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“The affidavit raising the preliminary objection stated- That as the two Judges of Larger Bench have already disagreed with the view of the earlier Division Bench, their presence in the Full Bench will be a hindrance for an independent and open mind hearing. The point of law/question of law referred to be determined cannot be fair and unbiased. That, in this premises, the view of a third Judge will be immaterial as the disagreed view of the two judges will prevail. It is just like loosing of the case by the sole respondent is preordained.”

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court stated that though it may be true that the petitioner cannot be present at the same time on the entire stretch of 3 kms, but, the criminals having carried out activities at 12 places without being noticed by the petitioner, clearly shows that he is not diligent in the performance of his duty and it is a case of gross dereliction thereof.

Continue reading
3 yrs limitation on suit of same cause
Case BriefsSupreme Court

“The right to sue under Article 113 of the Limitation Act accrues when there is an accrual of rights asserted in the suit and an unequivocal threat by the defendant to infringe the right asserted by the plaintiff in the suit.”

Continue reading
Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Even if it is presumed that signing an agreement with an arbitration clause can be regarded as submission of a (non-existent) dispute to arbitration, it will not follow that as a matter of law, since there will be no implied authority to execute such a contract. All these are issues that will pose mixed questions of fact and law and will relate to the substance of existence rather than the form of existence, i.e., a written agreement.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

In the present case, the allegation against the respondent (‘man’) was of domestic violence, while he lived in a shared household with the petitioner (‘woman’) for almost seven years in a domestic relationship, if not as a married couple but at least as a couple in the nature of marriage.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

While purchasing a motor vehicle, the name of the manufacturer becomes very important and an average consumer while deciding to purchase a motor vehicle would not only consider the model of the motor vehicle but also its manufacturer.

Continue reading
S. 125(4) on non-compliance of restitution decree
Case BriefsSupreme Court

“It would depend on the facts of the individual case, and it would have to be decided, on the strength of the material and evidence available, whether the wife still had valid and sufficient reason to refuse to live with her husband, despite such a decree. There can be no hard and fast rule in this regard, and it must invariably depend on the distinctive facts and circumstances.”

Continue reading
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“The right to life and personal liberty cannot be rendered nugatory by unwarranted delays in the judicial process, particularly where such delay(s) is neither attributable to the accused nor justified by the prosecution with cogent reasons. An individual cannot be kept behind bars for an inordinate period of time by taking refuge in the rigours of Section 37.”

Continue reading
plea of juvenility
Case BriefsSupreme Court

The Court explained that when the plea of juvenility was raised, it should have been dealt with under the existing laws at the relevant point of time, especially when there exists a tacit and clear admission as to the age of the Appellant.

Continue reading