Delhi High Court

delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Any employee working with an organization has the reasonable expectation of being paid a salary decently so that he can afford a decent standard of living from the said income. In case, the employee is not paid adequately, the same may render the employee unmotivated to work and the employee may not give his best in the organization and may look for other suitable jobs to supplement his/ her income.

delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Clause 2.6 of the MOU signed between the parties clearly stipulates that upon termination/determination of this agreement the developer/respondent shall have no right to use any brand/mark associated with the consultants/petitioners, and/or any brand/mark identical or deceptively similar thereto, in relation to Project, expansion or part thereof.

delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

FIRs were registered on the complaints of homebuyers, who have alleged that Amrapali Leisure Valley Private Limited, Amrapali Dream Valley Private Limited, and their directors/officials, including the applicant have committed offences of cheating, fraud and criminal breach of trust in respect of various residential projects in Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh.

delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court opined that, if the orders passed by this Court would not be implemented, it would lead to a situation where each department of the Government would be raising objections to the statement made by the other department.

delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The 10% increase in MRP permissible under Para 20 of Drugs (Price Control) Order, 2013 must be calculated based on the actual MRP of the non-scheduled formulation in the preceding twelve months and not based on what was the MRP permissible for the preceding twelve months.

delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“The Chairperson as head of the Committee will decide which school is to be inspected on a particular day and an intimation in advance will be given to the members. If the member/s does not remain present at inspection time, the inspection shall be made in their absence by the Chairperson.”

delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

As submitted by IT Team of the Law Department, the OSWS software has a built-in timeline and the maximum time within which the memos can pass through each level of officials, on the said web portal is between 3 to 7 days and the overall timeline for clearing of the bill would, therefore, be no more than 20 to 25 days.

delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The grievance of Patanjali Ayurved is that a video has been uploaded by respondent on the internet platforms owned by Meta Inc. having an advertisement of mens undergarments, wherein Patanjali’s trademark along with pictures of its brand ambassadors and directors are shown used unauthorizedly.