delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“The authorities rejected petitioner’s refund claim by mentioning that payments in respect of some of the invoices are received in advance, but respondents have not referred to any particular instance where payments in respect of any invoices are received prior to the date of invoices.”

delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“The Court failed to appreciate as to how the position, where not only does the respondent had the power to unilaterally appoint two out of the three arbitrators and compelled the petitioner to choose one of the panels of five arbitrators can be said to meet the test of ‘counter balancing’.”

delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The unfilled cans which have been seized, shall be released in favour of the Defendants, which were given to them on a superdari basis, in the presence of a representative of the plaintiff. The plaintiff’s representative may accordingly visit the Defendants’ premises on 01-11-2023 at 11:00 a.m.

delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The comparison of the features of the prior existing third party apps with Plaintiffs’ mobile app, fortifies the stand of the Defendants that the distinguishing features are not enough for the Plaintiffs to cross the threshold of idea expression dichotomy to claim originality and consequently protection in the gaming app and copyright infringement.