Is right to pre-emption a recurring right or exercisable only the first time? SC answers
Supreme Court analyses whether the right of pre-emption can be enforced for an indefinite number of transactions or it is exercisable only the first time.
Interpretation
SC| Section 12 of the Specific Relief Act has to be construed in a liberal, purposive manner that is fair and promotes justice
Supreme Court: The bench of UU Lait and Indira Banerjee, JJ has explained that Section 12 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963
SC gives 10 years’ time to Telecos to pay AGR dues
Supreme Court: Asking Telecom Operators to make the payment of 10% of the total AGR dues as by 31.3.2021, the 3-judge bench
Courts are duty bound to issue a writ of Mandamus for enforcement of a public duty: SC
Supreme Court: The bench of Indira Banjerjee and Indu Malhotra, JJ that the Courts are duty bound to issue a writ of
However laudable be the purpose, the Executive cannot deprive a person of his property without specific legal authority: SC
Supreme court: The 2-judge bench of Indira Banerjee and Indu Malhotra, JJ has held that Section 88 of Maharashtra Regional and Town
AGR Case| DoT withdraws 96% of AGR dues of PSUs; SC asks telecos to prove bonafides by paying reasonable amount
Supreme Court: In a major turnaround in the AGR case, with respect to Public Sector Undertakings, the Department of Telecommunication has decided
Property’s market value can be enhanced while deciding appeal under Section 47A of Stamp Act in case of obvious illegality
Supreme Court: Dealing with the questions relating to interpretation of Section 47-A of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 and the Tamil Nadu
AGR Case| SC asks telecom companies to file affidavit on how they propose to clear the dues
Supreme Court: The 3-judge bench of Arun Mishra, SA Nazeer and MR Shah, JJ has given 5 days to Telecom Service Providers
Every consideration received in foreign exchange does not ipso facto fall within the ambit of Section 80-O IT Act
Supreme Court: The 2-judge bench of AM Khanwilkar and Dinesh Maheshwari, JJ has held that for bringing any particular foreign exchange receipt
Unregistered individuals can practice architecture but can’t designate themselves as “architects”
Supreme Court: The bench of Dr. DY Chandrachud and Ajay Rastogi, JJ Section 37 of the Architects Act 1972 does not prohibit
SC dismisses Vodafone’s petition against the levy of one-time spectrum charges
Supreme Court: The bench of Arun Mishra and MR Shah, JJ has dismissed a petition filed by Vodafone against the levy of
No lapse of acquisition proceedings if government has ‘paid’ compensation
Supreme Court: In a landmark ruling the 5-judge bench of Arun Mishra, Indira Banerjee, Vineet Saran, MR Shah, and Ravindra Bhat, JJ
Courts should be slow in rejecting enforcement of foreign awards; SC elucidates principles
Supreme Court: A 3-judge bench of RF Nariman, Aniruddha Bose and V. Ramasubramanian, JJ has held that enforcement of a foreign award
“Let’s wind up the Supreme Court”, says a furious SC on non-compliance of it’s AGR order by telecos [Full Report]
Supreme Court: Taking a strong note of non-compliance of its order asking telecom companies to pay adjusted gross revenue of Rs 1.47
In a big blow to the Telecom Sector, SC refuses to change AGR definition [Full report]
Supreme Court: Refusing to change the definition of gross revenue as defined in clause 19.1 of the licence agreement granted by the
Section 102 CrPC doesn’t empower police to attach, seize and seal an immovable property
Supreme Court: The 3-judge bench of Ranjan Gogoi, CJ and Deepak Gupta and Sanjiv Khanna, JJ has held that the power of
Can’t interpret “by another year” under Rule 105 of Delhi School Education Rules 1973 as “by one year at a time”: SC
Supreme Court: The bench of Dr DY Chandrachud and Aniruddha Bose, JJ has held that the words “by another year” in Rule
MCA | Clarification under S. 232(6) of Companies Act, 2013; circular to remove doubts/ambiguities in “appointed date” & “acquisition date” with respect to mergers/amalgamations
Several queries have been received in the Ministry with respect to interpretation of the provision of Section 232(6) of the Companies Act,
Big relief for homebuyers as SC upholds the validity of the 2018 Amendments to IBC
Supreme Court: The 3-judge bench of RF Nariman, Sanjiv Khanna and Surya Kant, JJ has held the Amendment Act to Insolvency and
Section 5B of the KST Act and Rule 6(4)(m)(i) of the KST Rules operate in different spheres: SC
Supreme Court: When the bench of AM Khanwilkar and Ajay Rastogi, JJ was called upon to decide whether the condition of ‘use