Famous Banking Law Cases in India 2022 
Experts CornerSiddharth R Gupta

by Siddharth R. Gupta† and Prakriti††
Cite as: 2023 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 29

Experts CornerShardul Amarchand Mangaldas

by Shantanu Tyagi† and Aishani Das††
Cite as: 2023 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 21

Case BriefsSupreme Court

The Court was called upon to decide as to while calculating the amount to be deposited as predeposit under Section 18 of the SARFAESI Act, 50% of which amount the borrower is required to deposit as pre-deposit and whether while calculating the amount of “debt due”, the amount deposited by the auction purchaser on purchase of the secured assets is required to be adjusted and/or appropriated towards the amount of pre-deposit to be deposited by the borrower under Section 18 of the SARFAESI Act.

Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Bombay High Court: While hearing a challenge to the Government Notification dated 04/10/2022 changing the jurisdiction of Dept Recovery Tribunals

Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Bombay High Court: The issue before the Court in the instant matter was that between a secured creditor (defined in

Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Bombay High Court: While deciding the instantwrit petition wherein the issue was regarding transgression of Additional District Magistrate’s jurisdiction under Section 14

Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: The bench of L. Nageswara Rao and BR Gavai*, JJ has held that the proceedings under the Securitisation and Reconstruction

Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: The Division Bench of L. Nageswara Rao and Vineet Saran*, JJ., quashed the confiscation order of Customs and Central Excise

Experts CornerKhaitan & Co

by Rahul Chakraborti†, Prashamsha Tulachan†† and Saumya Agarwal†††
Cite as: 2022 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 27

Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: Holding Advocates to be officers of the Court, the bench of AM Khanwilkar* and CT Ravikumar, JJ t has held

Case BriefsSupreme Court

“If it is held that the borrower can still, as a matter of right, pray for benefit under the OTS Scheme, in that case, it would be giving a premium to a dishonest borrower.”

Op EdsOP. ED.

by Deepanshi Gupta*and Aadesh Shinde**

Experts CornerShardul Amarchand Mangaldas

by Bhoumick Vaidya† and Harshini Kotecha††

Cite as: 2021 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 77

Kerala High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Kerala High Court: A.M. Badar, J., while dismissing the present petition, reiterated the observations of the Supreme Court in the words, “In

Case BriefsSupreme Court Roundups

♦ Did you know? In the year 2020, All the Constitution bench verdicts were unanimous with no dissenting opinion. 9 out of

Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: The 3-judge bench of L. Nageswara Rao, Hemant Gupta* and Ajay Rastogi, JJ has upheld Kerala High Court’s decision holding

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court: A Division Bench of Hima Kohli and Subramonium Prasad, JJ., considered the following question: Whether a bank/financial institution can institute

Op EdsOP. ED.

by Renjith Mathew*  

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Karnataka High Court: P.S. Dinesh Kumar, J., rejects the petition seeking the writ of certiorari against the order of NCLT imposing heavy

Reserve Bank of India
COVID 19Op EdsOP. ED.

by Arjun Harkauli*