adani power
Case BriefsSupreme Court

The Supreme Court opined that it is unjust on the part of Haryana Utilities to say that 70% of the installed capacity should be further bifurcated and the Change in Law benefit should be restricted only to 70% of the installed capacity.

Appellate Tribunal for Electricity
Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

The interest in ‘carrying cost' is nothing but time value for money and the only way a party can be afforded the benefit of restitution in every which way.

Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: In a big win for Adani Power Limited, the 3-judge bench of NV Ramana, CJI and Krishna Murari and Hima