Carry only Bare Acts, without notes: BCI says no books, notes, study material allowed in examination hall, AIBE XVI onwards
Bar Council of India has notified that AIBE XVI onwards — No books, notes or study material will be allowed in the
Advocates
Madras HC | Zero tolerance for Advocates’ unlawful conduct: HC to ensure that activities of some advocates do not spoil image of entire profession
Madras High Court: N. Anand Venkatesh, J., while addressing the present petition expressed that: “This is the third occasion, in the last
BCI decides to hold next All India Bar Examination on 21st March, 2021; No change in dates for AIBE–XV
Bar Council of India decided to hold the next All India Bar Exam on 21-03-2021. AIBE-XV is to be held on the
Latest Issue of Social-Legal Review [Vol. 16(1) 2020] published
Contents Articles A RIGHT TO THE INDIAN CITY? LEGAL AND POLITICAL CLAIMS OVER HOUSING AND URBAN SPACE IN INDIA………………1 —Mathew Idiculla COEXISTENCE
NALSAR Student Law Review [Vol. XIV, 2020] is out now!
Contents Articles DESIGNED FOR ABUSE: SPECIAL CRIMINAL LAWS AND RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED…………………………………………………………………………………………. 1 —Kunal Ambasta UNIFORMITY IN DIVERSITY?: REFLECTING ON THE
Latest Volume of NLUO Law Journal [Vol. VII, 2020] is out now!
Contents Articles India’s Electoral Legal System: Need for Structural Reform Krishan Mahajan………………………………………………………………… 1 Elections and Election Commission of India: A Contemporary Evaluation
Madras HC | If Advocate stickers are being misused for criminal activities by sticking it in vehicles to intimidate Police, why not ban the same? Court asks
Madras High Court: The Division Bench of N. Kirubakaran and B. Pugalendhi, JJ., addressed a matter wherein it was stated that the law
Bombay High Court to start Physical Hearing of cases on an experimental basis from 1st December, 2020
Bombay High Court Advocates and the parties appearing in-person that, considering the precautionary measures due to outbreak of COVID-19, Chief Justice nominated
BCI extends last date for Advocates to furnish information required by Supreme Court e-Committee to 31-12-2020; Issues clarifications and directions for strict compliance
The General Council of the Bar Council of India at its meeting held on 7-11-2020 has again considered the requests received from
Bar Council of India releases new schedule for All India Bar Examination–XV [Check New Dates]
Bar Council of India releases new schedule for AIBE — XV ACTIVITY IMPORTANT DATES Online Registration had began from 16-05-2020 Bank Payment
Madras HC | Is participation of advocates permitted in proceedings before Ombudsman under Banking Ombudsman Scheme, 2006 promulgated by RBI? HC to contemplate
Madras High Court: A Division Bench of Amreshwar Pratap Sahi, CJ and Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy, J., to consider the issue with regard to
Del HC | Video Conferencing link for proceedings to be provided only to advocates, IOs concerned and not to any other person or correspondent
Delhi High Court: While dismissing the matter, Suresh Kumar Kait, J., stated that a very unpleasant situation came before the Court during the
Bombay HC exempts Advocates from wearing gowns while appearing in course of physical hearing
Bombay High Court exempts Advocates from wearing gowns while appearing before the Courts in the course of physical hearing till further orders. However,
BCI |Rules for “No Confidence” against Office Bearers of BCI, Members of BCI and Officer Bearers of State Bar Councils — Notified
Due to increased groupism in the Bar Councils, on many occasions Bar Council of India has been receiving complaints and a very
SC Collegium approves elevation of 6 Advocates as Judges of Delhi HC
Supreme Court Collegium approves the proposal for elevation of the following Advocates, as Judges of the Delhi High Court: 1. Jasmeet Singh,
SC Collegium approves elevation of 2 Advocates and 2 Judicial Officers as Judges of Kerala HC
Collegium Statement Supreme Court Collegium approves the proposal for elevation of the following Advocates and Judicial Officers as Judges of the Kerala
Bom HC | “Advocates, their staff are integral part of system dispensing fundamental right of access to justice”: Govt. to take informed decision on advocates request for inclusion in essential services
Bombay High Court: A Division Bench of Dipankar Datta, CJ and Sarang V. Kotwal, J., has advised the Maharashtra Government to take an informed
Del HC | Advocates are capable enough to approach Court, if aggrieved: Plea for non-inclusion of advocates as “Professionals” under MSME Act dismissed
Delhi High Court: A Division Bench of D.N. Patel, CJ and Prateek Jalan, J., held that as and when any advocate approaches the
Bom HC | State Legislature cannot be directed to include “Advocates” under the category of “Essential Services”
Bombay High Court: A Division Bench of S.S. Shinde and Madhav Jamdar, JJ., held that State Legislature cannot be directed to include “Advocates”
A Reverse Swing: What Advocates expect from the Judges?
by Kashyap Joshi*