Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News
Madras High Court: N. Anand Venkatesh, J., while addressing the present petition expressed that: “This is the third occasion, in the last
Bar Council of India decided to hold the next All India Bar Exam on 21-03-2021. AIBE-XV is to be held on the
Contents Articles A RIGHT TO THE INDIAN CITY? LEGAL AND POLITICAL CLAIMS OVER HOUSING AND URBAN SPACE IN INDIA………………1 —Mathew Idiculla COEXISTENCE
Contents Articles DESIGNED FOR ABUSE: SPECIAL CRIMINAL LAWS AND RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED…………………………………………………………………………………………. 1 —Kunal Ambasta UNIFORMITY IN DIVERSITY?: REFLECTING ON THE
Contents Articles India’s Electoral Legal System: Need for Structural Reform Krishan Mahajan………………………………………………………………… 1 Elections and Election Commission of India: A Contemporary Evaluation
Madras High Court: The Division Bench of N. Kirubakaran and B. Pugalendhi, JJ., addressed a matter wherein it was stated that the law
Bombay High Court Advocates and the parties appearing in-person that, considering the precautionary measures due to outbreak of COVID-19, Chief Justice nominated
The General Council of the Bar Council of India at its meeting held on 7-11-2020 has again considered the requests received from
Bar Council of India releases new schedule for AIBE — XV ACTIVITY IMPORTANT DATES Online Registration had began from 16-05-2020 Bank Payment
Madras High Court: A Division Bench of Amreshwar Pratap Sahi, CJ and Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy, J., to consider the issue with regard to
Delhi High Court: While dismissing the matter, Suresh Kumar Kait, J., stated that a very unpleasant situation came before the Court during the
Bombay High Court exempts Advocates from wearing gowns while appearing before the Courts in the course of physical hearing till further orders. However,
Due to increased groupism in the Bar Councils, on many occasions Bar Council of India has been receiving complaints and a very
Supreme Court Collegium approves the proposal for elevation of the following Advocates, as Judges of the Delhi High Court: 1. Jasmeet Singh,
Collegium Statement Supreme Court Collegium approves the proposal for elevation of the following Advocates and Judicial Officers as Judges of the Kerala
Bombay High Court: A Division Bench of Dipankar Datta, CJ and Sarang V. Kotwal, J., has advised the Maharashtra Government to take an informed
Delhi High Court: A Division Bench of D.N. Patel, CJ and Prateek Jalan, J., held that as and when any advocate approaches the
Bombay High Court: A Division Bench of S.S. Shinde and Madhav Jamdar, JJ., held that State Legislature cannot be directed to include “Advocates”
by Kashyap Joshi*
In order to further contain the spread of COVID-19, Delhi High Court notified that till further orders, while appearing before this High