Arbitration Archives | Page 9 of 15

J&K and Ladakh HC | Interim Award v/s Interim Order; HC clarifies prerequisites of S. 31 (6) and S. 17 (1)(ii)(e) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court: Sanjay Dhar, J., clarified the difference between Interim Award and Interim Order. The Bench stated,

Law School News Others

Legal Expatiate | 5 Days Online National Advanced Workshop on Arbitration Proceedings [September 23- 27, 2021]: Register by September 23

About Legal Expatiate Legal Expatiate is an initiative in lockdown to bring together the best talent of this country and to infuse

Case Briefs Supreme Court

SC resolves quandary over interplay of S. 9 and S. 17 of Arbitration Act, answers whether court can entertain application for interim measures after arbitral tribunal has been constituted

Supreme Court: A Division Bench comprising of Indira Banerjee and J.K. Maheshwari, JJ. held that once an Arbitral Tribunal is constituted, the

Case Briefs Supreme Court

“There is a disturbing tendency of courts setting aside arbitral awards …”: SC upholds arbitration award of Rs 2728 crore plus interest in favour of Delhi Airport Metro Express (P) Ltd.

Supreme Court: A Division Bench comprising of L. Nageswara Rao and S. Ravindra Bhat, JJ. upheld the arbitral award of Rs 2782.33

OP. ED.SCC Journal Section Archives

Section 7(4)(C) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 : Acquiesence by Silence?

by M. Dhyan Chinnappa† and Rohan Tigadi††

Law Firms News News

Mayuri Tiwari Agarwala joins Khaitan & Co’s Arbitration Practice

Mayuri Tiwari Agarwala graduated from GNLU in 2010 and completed her masters from Columbia Law School, New York in 2015. Her practice

Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas Experts Corner

Recent Arbitration Judgments Involving Construction Disputes

by Shalaka Patil† and Rahul Mantri††
Cite as: 2021 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 65

Case Briefs High Courts

Ker HC | Syllogistic scope of Ss. 11(5) and 11(6) of the Arbitration Act, 1996; HC unclouds the line

Kerala High Court: Devan Ramachandran, J., held that parties to arbitration cannot nominate the arbitrator even if the Arbitration Agreement provides so.

Case Briefs High Courts

J&K and Ladakh HC | “Specific mention of particular Court at particular place excludes jurisdiction of other courts”, says HC while addressing syllogistic issue of ‘venue’ and ‘seat’ of arbitration

Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court: Tashi Rabstan, J., while addressing the syllogistic issue of ‘venue and ‘seat’ of arbitration dismissed

Case Briefs Supreme Court

Foreign arbitral award enforceable against non-signatories to agreement; ‘perversity’ no longer a ground to challenge foreign award; tort claims arising in connection with agreement are arbitrable: SC expounds law on foreign awards

Supreme Court: A Division Bench comprising of R.F. Nariman and B.R. Gavai, JJ. held that a foreign arbitral award is enforceable against

Case Briefs High Courts

Del HC | Can a party unilaterally appoint an Arbitrator of their choice? Read on

Delhi High Court: Suresh Kumar Kait, J., reiterated that no party could be permitted to unilaterally appoint an Arbitrator, as the same

Op Eds OP. ED.

Grant of Escalation Charges by Arbitrator: Navigating Beyond the Realms of Contract

by Abhishek Goyal†

Experts Corner Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas

Writ Jurisdiction and Arbitration — A Balancing Act

by Ajit Warrier†, Arundhati Srivastava†† and Sajal Mendiratta†††

Cite as: 2021 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 63

Case Briefs Supreme Court

SC | Is there a scope for interference in case of encashment of bank guarantee? Read on

Supreme Court: The Division Bench of Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hemant Gupta, JJ., while addressing the present matter, remarked that: Fate of

Op Eds OP. ED.

Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award in India: In Search of a Formidable Shore

by Kumar Sumit* and Avani Tiwari**

Op Eds OP. ED.

Setting Aside of Domestic Arbitral Award in Conflict with Public Policy of India

by Rupal Panganti†

Case Briefs Supreme Court

Explained: Does Limitation Act, 1963 apply to arbitration proceedings under Section 18(3) of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006

Supreme Court: The bench of Ashok Bhushan and R. Subhash Reddy*, JJ has held that the Limitation Act, 1963 is applicable to

Case Briefs Supreme Court

Explained: Maintainability of counter claims in arbitration proceedings under Section 18(3) of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006

Supreme Court: The bench of Ashok Bhushan and R. Subhash Reddy*, JJ has held that the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development

Case Briefs High Courts

Del HC | Ambiguity in contractually stipulated obligations favours whom? Court discusses while refusing interference in arbitral award

Delhi High Court: Sanjeev Narula, J., refused to interfere in the interim arbitral award whereby the sole arbitrator had allowed certain claims of

Case Briefs High Courts

Del HC adverts to scope of judicial review of an arbitral award; Wades through bunch of pleas including violation of Part 1, CPC and insurance against breakage during transit, etc.

Delhi High Court: V. Kameswar Rao, J., refused to interfere with the award passed by the Arbitrator and dismissed a petition filed under