Case Briefs

Madhya Pradesh High Court: The Division Bench of Mohammad Rafiq, CJ. and Vijay Kumar Shukla, J., heard a writ petition which was

Case BriefsSupreme Court (Constitution Benches)

“The aspiration of equal treatment of the lowest strata, to whom the fruits of the reservation have not effectively reached, remains a

Case BriefsCOVID 19High Courts

Bombay High Court: A Division Bench of S.J. Kathawalla and R.I. Chagla, JJ., quashed and set aside the unreasonable restriction placed by the

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Bombay High Court: A Division Bench of M.G. Sewlikar and T.V. Nalawade, JJ., while allowing the present petition with respect to the

Punjab and Haryana High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Punjab and Haryana High Court: A Division Bench of A.B. Chaudhari and Harnaresh Singh Gill, JJ., addressed a petition where petitioner challenged

Case BriefsSupreme Court

The civility of a civilization earns warmth and respect when it respects more the individuality of a woman. The said concept gets

Hot Off The PressNews

Supreme Court: The Court, today, is likely to pronounce its judgment on a plea that seeks to ban lawmakers from practising as

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Bombay High Court: A Division Bench comprising of V.K. Tahilramani, Acting CJ and M.S. Sonak, J. dismissed a petition challenging the rejection

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Jammu & Kashmir High Court: The Single Judge Bench comprising of M.K. Hanjura, J., decided in a writ petition that the decision

Hot Off The PressNews

On Day 4 of the Aadhaar hearing, the 5-judge bench of Dipak Misra, CJ and Dr. AK Sikri, AM Khanwilkar, Dr. DY Chandrachud

Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: In the issue relating to ban of female devotees between the age group of 10 to 50 from entering the

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court: Mr. R.P. Luthra,  a practising advocate had filed a writ petition before the Delhi High Court challenging the recommendation of

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Calcutta High Court: Citing the concept of ‘co-extensive’ rights as laid down in Delhi Cloth and General Mills Co. Limited v. Union