Deconstructing the threshold requirements for homebuyers under IBC
by Mitali Ingawale† & Sumit Kulkarni††
CIRP
Avoidable transaction and the offenders window of escape: A perspective
by Naman Singh Bagga†, Maneesh Subramaniam†† and Anurag Tripathi†††
India’s tryst with cross-border insolvency law: How series of judicial pronouncements pave the way?
by Manisha Arora* and Raushan Kumar**
Adjudicating authority under IBC may disapprove the resolution plan approved by the Committee of Creditors but cannot modify it: Supreme Court
Supreme Court: In an important ruling relating to the corporate insolvency resolution process concerning the corporate debtor, Jaypee Infratech Limited, the 3-judge
NCLAT | ‘As is where is basis, as is what is basis, whatever there is basis’; A super imposed condition in auctions | Reiterated again
National Company Law Appellate Authority Tribunal (NCLAT), New Delhi: The Bench of Justice Bansi Lal Bhatt (Acting Chairperson), Shreesha Merla (Technical member)
Green Channelling of CIRPs: Pros and Cons
Bhumesh Verma, Managing Partner, Corp Comm Legal and Ishika Chattopadhyay, Student researcher, Final year student Department of Law, University of Calcutta
Cite as: (2021) PL (CL) February 71
Kundan Care: Should struggling businesses be handed over to unwilling resolution applicants?
by Dhruva Gandhi† & Vinodini Srinivasan‡
NCLAT | Whether Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process can be initiated against Principal Borrower and Corporate Guarantor simultaneously for same set of debt and default? Tribunal decides
National Company Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): The Division Bench of Justice A.I.S Cheena (Judicial Member) and V.P. Singh (Technical Member) reinforced that in the
[SC ALERT] NCLAT’s decoder on appointment of a person as Resolution Professional: Will an ex-employee of Financial Creditor be eligible for appointment? Read on
SUPREME COURT ALERT This NCLAT Order has been set aside by the Supreme Court, the detailed report of which can be found