UAPA Judgment| Justice Sanjay Karol’s opinion on reliance on American decisions to read down Section 10 UAPA
Supreme Court said that a stand of whichever court, cannot be allowed to stand, if it is in ignorance of constitutional provisions
Constitutional
Explained| Supreme Court’s verdict upholding Constitutionality of S. 10(a)(i) of the UAPA, 1967
Supreme Court said that the object and purpose of the enactment of UAPA is to provide for more effective prevention of certain unlawful activities. To punish such a person who is continued as a member of such unlawful association which is declared unlawful due to unlawful activities can be said to be in furtherance of providing for effective prevention of the unlawful activities.
Abolition of Orissa Administrative Tribunal Constitutionally valid: Supreme Court
Supreme Court said that the object of the Administrative Tribunals Act is to reduce arrears and enable the provision of speedy justice to litigants. Abolishing a State Administrative Tribunal would not frustrate this objective because SATs are not the only method by which the object is capable of being achieved.
MNLU Mumbai | 10 days Capacity Building Workshop on Research Methodology & Introduction to Statistical Package for Social Science
About MNLUM:- MNLU Mumbai established under the Maharashtra National Law University Act 2014 on 20th March 2014, is one of the premier
Supreme Court by a majority of 3:2 upholds the validity of 103rd Constitutional Amendment Act, 2019
Supreme Court: In a matter relating to the constitutional validity of 103rd Constitutional Amendment Act whichprovides for 10 percent reservation
Madras High Court | Appointment of Archaka to be done as per Agamas
Madras High Court: The Division bench of Munishwar Nath Bhandari, CJ. and N. Mala, J. has held that the temple
Analysing the Pegasus Case: Sentinel Reins in the Winged Horse
by Shubham Priyadarshi*
Aadhaar Act, 2016 constitutional not violative of right to privacy; linking of Aadhaar with mobile phone number, bank account not mandatory: SC
Supreme Court: In a 1448-pages detailed judgment, the 5- Judge Bench comprising of CJ Dipak Misra and A.K. Sikri, A.M. Khanwilkar, Dr D.Y.