Case BriefsSupreme Court

“Merely because no provision in the Act makes the transaction void or says that no title in the property passes to the purchaser in case there is contravention of the provisions of Section 31, will be of no avail. That does not validate the transfer referred to in Section 31, which is not backed by “previous” permission of the RBI.”

Op EdsOP. ED.

Bhumesh Verma, Managing Partner, Corp Comm Legal and Namrata Singhal, Third year BBA LLB student, Vivekananda Institute of Professional Studies

Cite as: (2020) PL (CL) December 69

Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: On the question of liability to be proceeded with for offence under Section 68 of FERA, 1973, the bench of

Op EdsOP. ED.

by Vatsala Pant*

Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: The bench of AM Sapre and Indira Banerjee, JJ has held that the appellate forum for deciding the appeals arising

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court: A Single Judge Bench of the Delhi High Court comprising of Sanjeev Sachdeva, J., allowed a Criminal Revision Petition

Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: In an appeal filed against the order of the Bombay High Court which had dislodged the order of discharge passed