Does framing of charge means that accused is guilty or does it imply that accused may be guilty? Del HC elaborates
Delhi High Court: Expressing that, the revisional jurisdiction is not meant to test the waters of what might happen in the trial,
Delhi High Court: Expressing that, the revisional jurisdiction is not meant to test the waters of what might happen in the trial,
Rajasthan High Court: Pushpendra Singh Bhati, J., refused to interfere with the impugned order due to lack of any legal infirmity. The
Delhi High Court: Subramonium Prasad, J., expressed: “It is well settled that while exercising its jurisdiction under Section 397/401 IPC the revisional
Punjab and Haryana High Court: Harnaresh Singh Gill, J., rejected the bail application filed by the applicant-accused in connection with the FIR
Karnataka High Court: A Division Bench of Abhay Shreeniwas Oka, CJ and S. Vishwajith Shetty, J., in view of the present situation