No stipulation of period of completion of Serious Fraud Investigations under Companies Act
Supreme Court: The bench of Abhay Manohar Sapre and UU Lalit, JJ has held that Section 212 of the Companies Act, 2013
fraud
Del HC | Court is not storage of petitions filed by negligent litigants: Not permitted to blame previous counsel after 21 years for not providing case record
‘Vigilantibus, non-dermientibus, jura subveniunt’ (the law helps those who are watchful and not those who are asleep) Delhi High Court: Vinod Goel, J.,
Breaking | UK’s green signal for the extradition process of business tycoon Vijay Mallya
As reported by the media, Sajid Javid the UK Home Secretary signed the extradition order of Vijay Mallya on 04-02-2019. Westminster Magistrates’
UK Court allows Vijay Mallya’s extradition to India; dismisses plea regarding lack of fair trial stating “do not accept that Courts in India are there to do what politicians tell them to do”
Westminster Magistrates’ Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Senior District Judge (the Chief Magistrate) Emma Arbuthnot accepted the Government of India’s
Civil Court has jurisdiction to decide issues relating to cancellation of document alleged to be brought into existence by committing fraud
Patna High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Sanjay Kumar, J. set aside a trial court order abating a title suit
Matters of medical negligence, in the absence of allegations of fraud or forgery, are amenable to the jurisdiction of consumer fora
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC): A Division Bench of S.M. Kantikar and Dinesh Singh, Members, allowed an appeal filed against the
Fraud vitiates everything—Magistrate not barred under CrPC from recalling his order procured by misleading the court
Bombay High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Mangesh S. Patil, J. dismissed a writ petition filed against the order of
Power to take decisions prejudicial to a person must be exercised in accordance with ‘natural justice’
Bombay High Court: The Division Bench of Bharati H. Dangre and S.C. Dharmadhikari, JJ., addressed a petition concerning the cancellation of an
Order XXI Rule 90 CPC allows setting aside of an auction sale only on grounds of fraud or material irregularity
Punjab and Haryana High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Kuldip Singh, J. dismissed the appeal filed against the order passed
No interference with arbitral award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act till manifest fraud, bias, or injustice perceived
Gauhati High Court: The appellant company invited tenders for transportation of gas cylinders to which the respondent company replied and was accepted
Individuals not reporting a company’s legal violations, cannot claim protection under the Dodd-Frank Reform’s anti-retaliation provisions
Supreme Court of the United States: While deciding the issue that whether the 2010 Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act,
SC to Unitech MD Sanjay Chandra: Deposit Rs. 750 Cr by December-end or stay in jail
Supreme Court: Refusing to release Sanjay Chandra and Ajay Chandra, involved in the Unitech Flats controversy as alleged by the home-buyers, the
Insider trading: Recipient of ‘confidential information’/’Tippee’ can be held liable for fraud
Supreme Court: Dealing with the legality of ‘non-intermediary frontrunning’ in security market under the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Prohibition of
CIC issues show-cause notice to postal authorities on no action being taken against officers perpetuating fraud by issuing false receipts without signatures
Central Information Commission: While hearing upon the present matter wherein the issue was related to few people perpetuating fraud by way of
VYAPAM Scam: No relief to 634 students who had gained admission to MBBS course by using unfair means
Supreme Court: In the matter where the appellants had challenged the order cancelling the admissions to Medical Institutes in the wake of
Mere allegation of fraud simplicitor may not be a ground to nullify the effect of arbitration agreement between the parties
Supreme Court: Explaining the scope of Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the Bench of Dr. A.K. Sikri and