NPA Classification ― Whether Opportunity of Prior Hearing Required?
by Prashant Tripathi†
insolvency and bankruptcy code
NCLT admits Go Air insolvency plea
A creditor has limited grounds to object to S. 10 of IBC application.
Khaitan & Co acts as legal counsel for Reliance Industries Limited and Assets Care & Reconstruction Enterprise Ltd in relation to submission of Resolution Plan for Sintex Industries Limited
DEAL DETAILS Reliance Industries Limited | Sintex Resolution Plan Khaitan & Co acted as legal counsel for Reliance Industries Limited and Assets
Call for Blogs | RGNUL Centre for Business Laws and Taxation [Rolling Submissions]
About Rajiv Gandhi National University of Law, Punjab Rajiv Gandhi National University of Law (RGNUL), Punjab, was established by the State Legislature
Initiation of IBC proceedings does not absolve Company Directors/Signatories of criminal liability under Section 138 NI Act: SC
The Supreme Court observed that the scope of nature of proceedings under the two Acts are quite different and would not intercede each other.
Call for papers | 8th NLIU-Trilegal Summit
ABOUT THE NLIU-TRILEGAL SUMMIT ON CORPORATE AND COMMERCIAL LAWS The Centre for Business and Commercial Laws is thrilled to release the Call
Swiss Challenge and Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code – Does the Shoe Fit The Size?
by Swarnendu Chatterjee†, Anwesha Pal†† and Megha Saha†††
Cite as: 2023 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 22
IBC| Inconsistent position taken in the Vidarbha Industries verdict? Supreme Court issues notice
The petitioner alleged that the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal had relied upon the decision of Vidarbha Industries, which even though was clarified in review petition of Axis Bank but was still contrary to the settled position in law laid down in Innoventive Industries. Tushar Mehta, Solicitor General contended that the principle enunciated in Vidarbha Industries would be liable to dilute the substratum of the Code.
IBC| “No law would compel a person to do the impossible”, Supreme Court upholds validity of the moratorium period which debarred the appellant from making settlement payment.
The Supreme Court stated that it was neither a case where the appellant did not make any application within the stipulated time under the 2019 Scheme nor where the appellant deliberately did not deposit the settlement amount.
2023 SCC Vol. 1 Part 1
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — S. 33 — Power of modification of award under — Scope of: Award can be modified
The Intersection between Arbitration and Insolvency Proceedings: An Indian Perspective
Devna Arora* and Didon Misri**
2022 SCC Vol. 10 Part 4
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 — Or. 12 R. 6 — Grant of relief on the basis of admission — When
Recovering Foreign Award Debts in Insolvency Proceedings
by Kartikey Mahajan, Siddhant Sharma and Jatan Rodrigues
Cite as: 2022 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 87
NCLAT | Application under Section 7 IBC relating to the interest component due even if principal amount is not due, held maintainable
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal | Upholding the maintainability of an application filed under S. 7 IBC, a bench comprising of Rakesh
GNLU | 6th International Conference on Economic Analysis of Law, Governance and Public Policy
GNLU Centre for Law and Economics, is committed to promoting the interdisciplinary study of law and economics in India, is
Date of default and acknowledgement are two different events; NCLAT imposes penalty of Rs. 25 lakhs for attempting to stop implementation of a RERA order
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal | While dealing with an appeal challenging the impugned order passed by NCLT, Ashok Bhushan*, J., Dr.
NCLAT | Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code does not contemplate lookback period; Information and relevant documents not to be withhold from Liquidator to investigate transactions done even beyond two years from Insolvency Commencement Date
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal | While dealing with an appeal challenging the impugned order passed by NCLT, Anant Bijay