Implementation of IP vis-à-vis IT Law and E-Commerce in India
by Nilanshu Shekhar† and Rishabh Manocha††
intellectual property rights
Faculty of Law, AMU appoints Prof. Dr. Zafar Mahfooz Nomani as the new Dean
As per an official University release, Prof. Dr. Zafar Mahfooz Nomani has been appointed as the Dean of the Faculty of Law,
Call for Papers: One-Day National Seminar on Contemporary Issues in Intellectual Property Rights
Organized by Department of Law, Aliah University in collaboration with IIC, Aliah University Date of the Seminar: 30th April, 2023. Venue: Aliah
Call for Papers | NUALS Intellectual Property Law Review (Vol 5)
About CIPR, NUALS The National University of Advanced Legal Studies (NUALS) Kochi, established the ‘Centre for Intellectual Property Rights’ (CIPR) to promote
EBC Learning | Upskill Diploma in Advanced Intellectual Property Rights
EBC Learning Presents a Complimentary preview course on Commercialising patents. This Preview Course covering Intellectual Property Rights brings you a practitioner's perspective
“SUBWAY” and “SUBERB” not phonetically and deceptively similar; Delhi High Court dismisses Subway’s plea for injunction for its mark “SUBWAY” against Infinity Food’s mark “SUBERB”
The Delhi High Court dismissed Subway's plea for injunction for its mark “SUBWAY” against Infinity Food's mark “SUBERB” in a trade mark infringement case and held that the appearance of Infinity Food's red and white “SUBERB” mark could not be said to be deceptively similar to Subway's device mark, “SUBWAY”.
Delhi High Court held RAJNIPAAN guilty for infringement for adopting deceptively similar mark and replaced ‘GANDHA’ with ‘PAAN’ with an intention to ride upon goodwill and reputation of RAJNIGANDHA
The trademark RAJNIGANDHA has been declared as a well-known mark by this Court and is entitled to a high degree of protection. The impugned mark is visually and structurally deceptively similar to the Plaintiffs’ trademark.
Delhi High Court grants ex parte ad interim injunction against Jamshedpur based restaurant SOCIAL 75 for using the registered trademark SOCIAL
Delhi High Court: In a trademark infringement suit filed by a company namely, Impresario Entertainment and Hospitality Pvt Ltd. (‘plaintiff’) running a
Delhi High Court refers trademark infringement suit between CHAAYOS’ and ‘CHAIOPS’ to mediation; Appoints Sidharth Chopra as mediator
Delhi High Court: In a suit filed by Sunshine Tea House Pvt Ltd. (‘plaintiff’) for its brand CHAAYOS was seeking permanent injunction
“Such cases highlight the perils of internet-based businesses”; Delhi High Court directs DoT and MEITY to block website posting defamatory reviews about LIVSPACE
Delhi High Court: In a case filed by Livspace Pte. Ltd. (‘plaintiff 1') and Home Interior Designs E-Commerce Private Limited
Delhi High Court restrains company selling keychains and baggage tags having VISTARA marks online; Raises security concerns and directs damages of Rs 20 lakh
Delhi High Court: In a case filed by Tata Sia Airlines (‘plaintiff') seeking decree of permanent injunction against company selling
Delhi High Court | Theo recognizes Theobroma as owner and proprietor of mark “THEOBROMA”; Settlement terms agreed between parties
Delhi High Court: In a case relating to two marks being ‘Theobroma’ (‘defendant’) and Theos (‘plaintiff’), based out of Bombay and Delhi
[Trademark] Ker HC| No question of confusion as the products fall in different classes; HC directs Registrar of the Companies to register LLP by proposed name
Kerala High Court: N. Nagresh, J., heard the instant petition wherein the petitioner had approached this Court seeking to set aside rejection
IPAB’S Non Provision to appeal to Supreme Court
The applicants of all Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs) can directly file a Special Leave Petition (SLP) before the Hon’ble Supreme Court against
The Intellectual Property Rights (Imported Goods) Enforcement Amendment Rules, 2018 notified
G.S.R. 581 (E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 156 of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962),
Open Innovation and Intellectual Property Rights — A Paradox?
by Vaishali Singh*
In IP infringement cases, mere delay won’t defeat grant of injunction
Madras High Court: While relying upon the Supreme Court decision in Midas Hygiene Industries (P) Ltd. v. Sudhir Bhatia, (2004) 3 SCC 90,
E-commerce websites are not bound to keep a check on products for IP infringement before advertising on their website
Delhi High Court: In a case regarding Intellectual Property Rights, the plaintiffs-manufacturer of water purifiers sought protection by obtaining design registrations under the
Owners of intellectual property rights not based in India not exigible to tax under Income Tax Act, 1961 on income accruing from transfer of such right
Delhi High Court: Dealing with the question of situs or location of intellectual property rights in logos, trade marks and brands with