Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court stated that workmen can challenge their retrenchment order even after accepting retrenchment amount in case their employer has not followed the mandate of S. 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

Karnataka High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Karnataka High Court: While deciding the instant appeal wherein the issue was whether the liability of the Insurance Company is

Gujarat High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Gujarat High Court: The instant petitions came up before the Court challenging the Award of the Labour Court, Vadodara, whereby which it

Op EdsOP. ED.

by Sridhar Rajagopalan†

Legislation UpdatesNotifications

The Labour Department, Haryana has taken up a series of measures to improve ‘Ease of Doing Business’. The emphasis has been on

Legislation UpdatesStatutes/Bills/Ordinances

Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code, 2020 received Presidential Assent on 28-09-2020. The Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code, 2020

Legislation UpdatesStatutes/Bills/Ordinances

The Code on Social Security, 2020 received Presidential Assent on 28-09-2020. The Code on Social Security, 2020 Second National Commission on Labour,

COVID 19Op EdsOP. ED.

by Animesh Upadhyay & Shashank Pandey*

Legislation UpdatesStatutes/Bills/Ordinances

Rajya Sabha passed The Code on Wages Bill, 2019  after due consideration and discussion. Lok Sabha has already passed the bill on

Legislation UpdatesStatutes/Bills/Ordinances

13 Central Labour Laws brought in the ambit of New Code

Cabinet DecisionsLegislation Updates

As reported by PTI, Cabinet has approved the Code on Wages Bill which seeks to : ” subsume existing laws related to

Op EdsOP. ED.

by Devika Sharma†

Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: The bench of Madan B. Lokur and NV Ramana, JJ directed the the Ministry of Rural Development to prepare an

Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: The Bench of Dr. A.K. Sikri and N.V. Ramana, JJ held that construction workers are not covered by the Factories