Ayodhya hearing|Both Hindus & Muslims have always called the disputed site a ‘Janmasthana’: Ram Lalla’s counsel
Supreme Court: Senior Advocate K Parasaran, appearing for the Ram Lalla, one of the parties in title dispute case, has told the Supreme
live streaming
Ayodhya hearing| SC seeks evidence of possession of Ramjanmabhumi from Nirmohi Akhara
Supreme Court: The Court has sought evidence of possession of Ramjanmabhumi from Nirmohi Akhara, after it contended that it had lost the
Ayodhya hearing| No Muslim has entered the disputed land since 1934: Nirmohi Akhara
Supreme Court: On Day 1 of the day-to-day hearing in the Ayodhya land dispute, Nirmohi Akhara, told the 5-judge bench of Ranjan
Ayodhya Dispute: SC to take a call on live streaming of proceedings
Supreme Court: The Court has agreed to consider the live streaming of the proceeding in the Ayodhya land dispute case after deliberation and
Live Streaming| Cases of constitutional and national importance to be live streamed; Supreme Court Rules to be modified suitably: SC
Supreme Court: A Bench comprising of CJ Dipak Misra and A.M. Khanwilkar and Dr D.Y. Chandrachud, JJ. decided in favour of live
Live Streaming of Court proceedings| Recommendations by AG KK Venugopal
“Justice should be administered in an open court” Supreme Court: In the matter concerning live streaming of court proceedings, the Attorney General
‘Live Streaming’ can be conducted on trial basis of constitutional matters of CJI’s Court: Attorney General
Supreme Court: The Bench comprising of CJ Dipak Misra and AM Khanwilkar and Dr DY Chandrachud JJ., received suggestions from the Attorney