![NCLAT](/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/MicrosoftTeams-image-395-390x293.jpg)
period of limitation
![NCLAT](/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/MicrosoftTeams-image-395-390x293.jpg)
![NCLAT](/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/NCLAT_New-440x293.jpg)
NCLAT | Time taken for preparation of the certified copy of the order/judgment excluded for limitation under Section 61 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal: Dismissing a time-barred appeal, the Principal Bench of National Company Appellate Tribunal comprising of Ashok Bhushan, J.
![](/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/CESTAT-Taxscan-440x293.jpg)
CESTAT | Even when an assessee has suppressed facts, the extended period of limitation can be invoked only when “suppression‟ or “collusion” is wilful with an intent to evade payment of duty; Tribunal decides
Customs, Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT): The Coram of Dilip Gupta (President) and C.J. Mathew (Technical Member) allowed an appeal
![](/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/IMG_3584-e1487939870879-440x293.jpg)
Raj HC | Larger period of limitation for filing appeals prescribed in Hindu Marriage Act would prevail over the period prescribed under Family Courts Act
Rajasthan High Court: A Division Bench of Mohammad Rafiq and Narendra Singh Dhaddha, JJ. quashed the appeal which pointed out that the
![](/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/IMG_3584-e1487939870879-440x293.jpg)
Raj HC | Period of limitation for preferring an appeal against a decision of Family Court is 90 days; S. 28 of HMA, 1955, to override the Family Courts Act
Rajasthan High Court: A Division Bench of Mohammad Rafiq and Narendra Singh Dhaddha, JJ. while harmonizing the provisions contained under Section 19
![](/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Delhi-HC-440x293.jpg)
Recovery of amount which is barred by limitation not allowed under Article 226; application for refund of fees against MCI rejected
Delhi High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Vibhu Bhakru, J. dismissed a writ petition filed for recovering the application fee
![](/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/High-Court-of-Sikkim-440x293.jpg)
No provision for exempting time lost due to ‘carelessness of counsel’ while computing limitation: Sikkim HC
Sikkim High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Meenakshi Madan Rai, J.,decided an application for condonation of delay filed under Order
![National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission](/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/NCDRC_-440x293.jpg)
NCDRC: Complaint liable to be dismissed, if filed beyond the period of limitation
National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission: The Commission held that if a complaint is filed beyond a period of two years from when